You don't owe for what wasn't done — but a targeted deduction is safer than refusing to pay anything at all.
You're not obliged to pay in full for work that hasn't been completed. Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, a trader must carry out services with reasonable care and skill, and if they haven't done what was agreed, that's a breach of contract you can act on. That said, refusing to pay anything at all is a stronger move than the law usually supports if some of the work genuinely was done properly — a targeted deduction reflecting what's actually missing or substandard is the more defensible approach.
| Situation | What you can do |
|---|---|
| Work is unfinished but what's been done is good quality | Ask them to complete it; pay for what's genuinely finished, withhold the rest |
| Work done so far is poor quality (not "reasonable care and skill") | Ask for it to be fixed for free, or a price reduction if they can't/won't fix it |
| They've done very little or nothing | You might not owe anything — but check what you've already paid, including any deposit |
| You already paid a deposit that seems too high for work actually done | Suggest a figure and ask for the difference to be refunded |
Put your position in writing rather than only saying it verbally. A workable script: "The Consumer Rights Act 2015 says that reasonable care and skill must be used while working, and that services must be carried out in a reasonable time. In my opinion, the work hasn't been completed / hasn't been carried out with reasonable care and skill. I want you to finish the work / fix the problem, or agree a reduced payment that reflects what hasn't been done."
Use Kibbo's Home Renovations & Services tools to work out a fair deduction and draft your response.
Explore Home Renovations & Services tools →