Flights & Travel · European Union & International

Missed Connections, Codeshares, and Technical Evidences in Delay Claims

Compensation is calculated on your final arrival delay — not your first flight's delay. That distinction alone can turn a "no claim" situation into full compensation.

The Myth

"If my first flight is delayed by only 20 minutes, causing me to miss my connection and land 6 hours late at my final destination, I'm only entitled to compensation based on the 20-minute first leg."

For which airline is actually liable when your itinerary involves a codeshare — the marketing carrier vs. the operating carrier — see our dedicated codeshare liability guide. This article focuses specifically on how the delay itself is calculated across a connection, and the technical evidence you need to prove it.

The Reality

Compensation for a missed connection is calculated based on the total accumulated delay at your final destination — not the delay on whichever individual leg actually caused the problem — provided the entire itinerary was booked under a single contract of carriage (a "through-ticket"). Proving this, however, requires capturing verifiable aviation data rather than relying on the airline's own account of what happened.

Through-Tickets vs. Self-Connecting: Why Booking Structure Matters

Through-Ticket (Single PNR / Contract)

The carrier is fully liable for rebooking, care, and delay compensation based on your final destination's arrival time — covered under EC261/UK261 and the Montreal Convention, treating the whole itinerary as one journey regardless of how many legs or connections it involves.

Self-Connecting (Separate PNRs / Tickets)

If you book two entirely separate tickets yourself to save money, the second airline generally treats you as a simple no-show if your first flight is delayed — there's no statutory compensation for a missed connection from either airline in this structure, and you absorb all rebooking and hotel costs yourself. This is one of the real trade-offs of self-connecting itineraries that budget travelers should weigh against the savings.

Landmark Case: Folkerts v. Air France (C-11/11)

The scenario: A passenger books a through-ticket from Bremen to Luanda via Paris. The first flight from Bremen is delayed by only 2 minutes — genuinely negligible — but the passenger misses the connecting flight in Paris and arrives in Luanda 11 hours late.

The CJEU ruling: Compensation depends on the delay experienced at the final destination, not the length of the delay on whichever leg actually triggered it. Because the passenger arrived more than 3 hours late in Luanda, full EC261 compensation was awarded — despite the initial delay being just 2 minutes. This is the ruling that makes the "my first flight was barely late" defense irrelevant on a through-ticket itinerary.

Essential Technical Evidence for Delay Disputes

To overcome an airline's rejection, you generally need independent, legally recognized data points rather than just your own account of events:

The Protocol: Building an Unassailable Delay Evidence File

  1. Photograph the aircraft door opening upon arrival, with a timestamp, to establish the legal "in-block" time for your final destination.
  2. Download independent flight logs from FlightAware or a similar tracking service, showing scheduled vs. actual block times for every leg.
  3. Preserve all boarding passes for every segment of the journey, including connecting legs, not just the final one.
  4. Obtain a written connection failure notice from the transfer desk, showing your rebooked flight assignment and new arrival time.

Our Flight Status & Evidence Tools directory links directly to FlightAware, Flightradar24, and METAR lookup resources for exactly this purpose. Once your evidence file is complete, generate a formal compensation letter citing your final destination's arrival delay.

Related Kibbo Tools

Sources